BASKET CONTENTS    CHECKOUT
 





Delivering the Science and the Art of Health Promotion

ABOUT US
ARTICLE SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE
CONTACT
HOME
PUBLICATIONS
RESOURCES
CONFERENCE
ADVOCACY
ADVERTISING

Robert F. Allen
Symbol of HOPE
Award

onlilne content link

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

global.gif (7826 bytes)

In This Issue

Editorial Team
Editor - Robert Karch, Ed.D
Associate Editor - Wolf Kirsten, MS
Managing Editor - Vivian Blaxell, Ph.D.
Publisher - Michael P. O'Donnell, Ph.D, MBA, MPH

Interrogating Global Health Promotion Education

By Bob Karch

As an educator, I have spent the last twenty-two years of my thirty-three years as a college professor focused on the educational preparation and training of health promotion professionals.  In so doing, I have always viewed education as both a process and a product. More specifically, as a process I see education as the sequence of events, activities, experiences and progressive operations designed to impart predetermined information to individuals.  Most often institutions of higher education organize these activities in a formal structure commonly known as a curriculum.  In contrast, however, when I think of education as a product, my thoughts focus on the results left by learning or, more descriptively, the residuum of any experience. Clearly, individuals do not retain all that they were exposed to in the process side of education, but what they do retain and, with that, what they take into the world at large, becomes the product of that experience.

For institutions of higher education and more specifically, those institutions that are now or want to be involved in the future education of health promotion professionals, it would be advisable that due consideration be given to both process and product. For example, do we as educators operating within our respective ivory towers believe that we know best what any well-educated health promotion professional needs to know in order to be successful in their career and, as such, do we then prescribe the "process" one needs to follow?  Or do we, as progressive educators, recognize that there is a real world outside our towers that is constantly changing and that we thus need to continually monitor the external environment to ascertain the "product" needed to best meet the health challenges in the world in which we all live?

The challenge that confronts any curriculum developer in this discipline is how to strike a balance between the two: process and product. Moreover, finding such a balance is even more challenging when we consider the many issues associated with the preparation of health promotion professionals for work within the international community. Perhaps that is why so few institutions have undertaken such a task. Some have taken up this responsibility however, and this issue of Global Perspectives highlights a few of those programs. But before you turn to read about those programs, let me share with you a few process and product "guiding" questions that you may chose to consider when developing a curriculum for the health promotion professional who desires to work in the international community.

  1. What are the health needs, problems and interests of the individuals that seem to transcend national and geographical boundaries?
  2. What are the country or regional specific health problems faced by contemporary societies?
  3. What are the global social, economic, political and environmental trends that will impact the future of health?
  4. Has consideration been given to the basic beliefs, philosophies and the societal presuppositions and principles that have guided educational programs in years past?
  5. Has care been taken to assure that the most appropriate instructional strategies are utilized?
  6. Has the appropriate information technology been utilized to facilitate both teaching and learning and can that technology be transferred and adopted both geographically and culturally?
  7. Has there been the appropriate mix of both cultural awareness and sensitivity in the instructional plan and curriculum?
  8. Is there a common body of knowledge that, with respect to health promotion, transcends the countries of the world and if so is that knowledge the foundation of the curriculum?
  9. Is there a common language or, at least, agreed upon terminology that has universal application and if so has that been incorporated into the educational process?
  10. Is there a process in place to continually monitor the health promotion "product" needs of the world at large?

These are but a few of the many questions that need to be addressed if we truly want to be responsible and responsive educators in this rapidly changing world of health promotion.  I would welcome your additions to this list.

As well, this issue of GP introduces a brand new feature on page 7. Global Innovations presents new and creative projects, programs and methods in the promotion of global health, and it presents this information in clear summary form, complete with essential contacts and addresses for the featured programs. This issue presents the German Bonus Project, and future issues will take you to innovative health promotion concepts and activities around the world. If you have suggestions for programs and projects to be included in the Innovations section in forthcoming issues, do let us know by emailing Vivian Blaxell at vivianuccia@earthlink.net.

And I wish you all a happy and healthy 2001!

The Study Program in Health Promotion and Health Management at University of Magdeburg – Stendal, Germany

by Dr. Kerstin Baumgarten

 The Mission

The course of studies in Health Promotion and Management at the University of Magdeburg was established as a project founded by the federal government in 1993. Apart from postgraduate studies in Public Health, the Magdeburg program is unique in Germany.

Government policies, the increase in life expectancy, and rapid developments in medical engineering pose new challenges to the system of health insurance, to prevention, and to health promotion. The reorganisation of German health care services, changes in the spectrum of diseases, globalisation and related changes in work call for a new ideal in the area of health protection and environmental protection. As Germany is bound to international standards (Ottawa Charta, Agenda 21, Health 21), skilled workers with the appropriate knowledge and abilities of health  and environmental protection and promotion are needed. The Magdeburg program fulfills the current quality standards in branches of the public health service and leads to professional competence of health promotion specialists. Health promotion constitutes a social process which has to be organised in all sectors of human life, in work, in the educational system and in leisure activities as well. Because of its global activities and partnerships, the program opens students to international fields of work. 

Structure of the Program

The course lasts eight semesters on a full–time basis and is separated into foundational and an advanced phase. Contents of the foundation core are as follows:

  • Introduction to health sciences and health promotion;
  • Introduction to human biology;
  • Introduction to psychology, education and sociology;
  • Health management and basics of law;
  • Methods of health promotion;
  • Public communication and internet work;
  • Statistics and research planning.

The advanced phase includes the following areas:

  • Project management;
  • Health education;
  • Health ecology;
  • Organisational development;
  • Health communication;
  • Methods of investigation and planning;
  • Professional competence development;
  • Electives: use and application of media, languages, health practice.

During the advanced phase of studies, students elect a field of specialization from the following areas:

  • Public health promotion;
  • Organisational development and occupational health;
  • Personal psychosocial health promotion;
  • Health communication.

Characteristic of the course of studies is the emphasis on the close connection between theory and practice that is produced through project work as well as internships in the field. Methodical and didactic construction promote the communicational, creative and problem solving skills of the students. Because of its global activities and partnerships, the program opens students to international fields of work. Upon successful completion of the program students will be awarded a Diploma in Health Promotion and Management.

Main fields of practice for graduates

The program works successfully. Ninety percent of the graduates got jobs in the field of health promotion and management. They work in the following fields of health care:

  • Insurance companies;
  • Rehabilitation centers  and clinics;
  • Enterprises (occupational health);
  • Educational institutions;
  • Community public health services.

Their main areas of activities in these fields are:

  • Research and publication of health reports and health advisement;
  • Public action, lobbying of decision makers and participation in the education of the public;
  • Continuing education in health issues such as nutrition, exercise of strategies for overcoming diseases;
  • Organisational development and creation of infrastructures for health;

In practice Magdeburg-educated health promotion specialists influence the quality of health promotion interventions. Main factors for these quality improvements are a generalistic qualification, a holistic health view and the adjustment of the qualification to conform with the strategies of the Ottawa Charta. Beside professionals in the behaviour area (like specialists in physical education and nutrition or psychologists) Magdeburg graduates are able to manage an intersectoral, cooperative approach in Health Promotion, so the study program contributes to establishment of a broad alliance for health in Germany and delivers qualified professionals to implement the German Health Reform 2000.

Kerstin Baumgarten is Assistant Professor in the Department of Social and Health Sciences, University of Magdeburg – Stendal, Germany. She may be reached at Fachhochschule Magdeburg, Fachbereich Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen, Breitscheidstr 2, 39114 Magdeburg, Tel: + 49 (0)391/8864301, Fax: + 49 (0)391/8864293, Email: Kerstin.Baumgarten@Sozialwesen.FH  Magdeburg.DE 
Health Promotion:
Global Perspectives

Health Promotion: Global Perspectives, a supplement to the American Journal of Health Promotion, is published bimonthly by the American Journal of Health Promotion, Inc., 1660 Cass Lake Road, Suite 104, Keego Harbor, Michigan 48320. Annual subscriptions are FREE when you subscribe to The Art of Health Promotion or American Journal of Health Promotion.
Copyright ©1999 by the American Journal of Health Promotion; all rights reserved. To order a subscription, make address changes, or inquire about editorial content, contact the American Journal of Health Promotion, P.O. Box 469079, Escondido, CA 92029. Phone: 800-783-9913 or 760-738-4970, Fax: 760-738-4805.

American Journal of
Health Promotion

American Journal of Health Promotion is the largest peer-reviewed journal devoted exclusively to health promotion.  Published 6 times per year, The Journal publishes original research and reviews on the health and financial impact of health promotion programs, as well as editorials, abstracts from other journals, and critiques of other published studies. Michael P. O'Donnell, Ph.D., MBA, MPH, serves as editor-in-chief. Subscription price for individuals is $99.95 in the United States, $108.95 in Canada and Mexico, and $117.95 in all other countries.  Institutional prices are $20 higher. To subscribe; Phone: 800-783-9913 or 760-738-4970; Fax: 760-738-4805.

The Art of 
Health Promotion
 
The Art of Health Promotion newsletter provides practical information to make programs more effective.  Each issue is devoted to a specific topic, such as increasing program participation, increasing management support, cost benefit analysis, use of newer technologies, characteristics of industry experts.  Larry S. Chapman, MPH, serves as newsletter editor. Published 6 times per year, the subscription price for individuals is $89.95 in the United States, $98.95 in Canada and Mexico, and $107.95 in all other countries. To subscribe; Phone: 800-783-9913 or 760-738-4970; Fax: 760-738-4805.

Health Promotion Manpower Training in Nigeria: Babcock University on the Move

By Godwin Nwadibia Aja

To a large extent, Nigeria’s health care system replicates the British colonial model that was institution-based, doctor/patient-centered and curative in nature. Ever since, many doctors and nurses and other health workers have been trained with bias in curative (primary/basic) care.

Development of Health Promotion Training

Realizing that primary health care is more than curative care, in 1978 Nigeria began to train community health officers, supervisors, assistants and aides (later known as community health extension workers), to manage and promote primary health care (PHC). However, they were rendered ineffective by more academically qualified, clinically-trained "colleagues," who claimed to be better equipped to run PHC. As a result, the highly experienced extension workers, usually with a Diploma or Certificate in Community Health or less, were often wrongly deployed as messengers and office assistants instead of PHC promoters. To further relegate them to the background, these "senior" colleagues resorted to enrolling and acquiring similar qualifications that the extension workers already had.

The Bachelor of Science in Public Health Education/Promotion

In order to fill the existing gap among this cream of health workers, in 1999 the Department of Health Sciences at Babcock University, introduced for the first time in Nigeria, a Bachelor of Science degree in Public Health Education/Promotion. The goal was to produce potential PHC managers with the advanced skills/credentials necessary for effective leadership and management of PHC-based health promotion in Nigeria. Admission into the program is now based on the national university’s admission requirements. Those with diploma or certificate in community health and lots of work experience are considered for the advanced 200 level courses.

There is heavy emphasis in the program on advocacy for PHC at the community level. Right from the first year of the four year course, students are exposed to:

  • Identifying the health and social needs of the community;
  • Helping communities identify local and material resources to meet community needs;
  • Mobilizing and stimulating the active participation of members of the community in the planning and implementation of health projects;
  • Liaising with government and non-governmental organisations with the aim of finding solutions to the health, social and other problems of the community.

Major health promotion courses offered include: Primary Health Care, Health Education and Promotion, Community Mobilization, Sociology and Anthropology, Health Consumer Education and Counseling, International Health, Change Process, School Health Education/Promotion, Health Program Planning and Evaluation, Research Methods in Health Education and Promotion, Media Technology, etc. These courses are especially tailored to expose the students to health care situations of the rural and urban poor. So far, about 35 students have been enrolled into the program within the first two years and several health promotion programs have been carried out both within and outside the school community.

Conclusion

The major health problems in Nigeria (malaria, diarrhea, measles, pneumonia, whooping cough, tuberculosis, malnutrition and others) are preventable and require the combined effort of other well-equipped public health professionals to combat. Presently, clinically trained doctors and nurses alone cannot manage community health promotion effectively and efficiently in Nigeria. An upgraded curriculum that culminates in a degree program other than a diploma further empowers other levels of PHC workers to compete favorably with other partners in the health care industry. The public health program of Babcock University is oriented towards training future managers/promoters of PHC whose overall goal would be to initiate social, political, economic, environmental and cultural actions that would lead to positive changes in the health status of the populace.

Godwin Nwadibia Aja is a lecturer in Community Health, Dept. of Health Sciences, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Nigeria. He may be contacted by email at: hai@infoweb.abs.net

Physical Fitness.  Nutrition.  Medical self-care.  Control of substance abuse.
Emotional Care for emotional crisis.  Stress Management
Social Communities.  Families.  Friends
Intellectual Educational.  Achievement.  Career development
Spiritual Love.  Hope.  Charity.

"Health promotion is the science and art of helping people change their lifestyle to move toward a state of optimal health. Optimal health is defined as a balance of physical, emotional, social, spiritual and intellectual health. Lifestyle change can be facilitated through a combination of efforts to enhance awareness, change behavior and create environments that support good health practices. Of the three, supportive environments will probably have the greatest impact in producing lasting change." (American Journal of Health Promotion, 1989, 3, 3, 5)

A Graduate Diploma in Indigenous Health Promotion in Sydney, Australia

Adapted by Vivian Blaxell from: http://www.achp.health.usyd.edu.au/pgrad.html#gdihp


Pmere laltyeke anwerne ampe mpwaretyeke
(We want to have our babies in the proper place).
"White people have never asked us where we want to have our babies.  They've always said, 'You've got to go to the hospital.'  This thing Congress is trying to do is really important thing.  That's why we gotta talk together as one, all black women, as all Aboriginal women.  We got to talk together.  Doesn't matter that we're from this country or that country.

Established in 1994, the Australian Centre for Health Promotion (ACHP), at the University of Sydney in the state of New South Wales, aims to contribute to better population health outcomes by working with practitioners to improve the quality of health policy and the effectiveness of health promotion practice through the application of research. To these ends, the ACHP is a WHO Collaborating Centre in Health Promotion Practice and plays a key role in South West Pacific Region of the International Union for Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE). As part of its education program, ACHP offers a unique Graduate Diploma in Indigenous Health Promotion. The course provides an accelerated program of study for people who are already working to promote the health of Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Island people. It is expected that students are already experienced Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Health Workers/Practitioners. Moreover, Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Island people are encouraged to apply and their applications will receive priority. The course supports the empowerment of Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Island people.

The course and its aims

The course is a postgraduate program in indigenous health promotion. It is offered by the Department of Public Health and Community Medicine at The University of Sydney. The Graduate Diploma was developed in close consultation with Aboriginal health professionals through the Australian Indigenous Health Promotion Network  and the Indigenous Studies Unit, Koori Centre at the University  of Sydney.

The course offers Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers/Practitioners the opportunity to add knowledge and skills in promoting health to their clinical and community knowledge and skills. The course has been designed to ensure that students’ learning is connected with their day-to-day work in their communities, and reaffirms the importance of community participation and community development. The course is based on national and international best practice in Indigenous health promotion.

As a result of completing the course students will be able to:

  • Communicate effectively with individuals and with all members of communities;
  • Identify community needs in relation to health promotion using a variety of sources of information and ensuring community participation;
  • Select priorities for health promotion in consultation with the community;
  • Develop plans of action based on principles of effective health promotion practice;
  • Develop plans for evaluating health promotion programs that will ensure that there is evidence of the outcome achieved;
  • Manage and implement health promotion projects effectively; and
  • Ensure that their health promotion practice is culturally-effective and is based on the principle of community participation.

Structure

The course is aimed at working health professionals, so studying part-time, students can complete the course with one year’s full time study. However, some students may wish to re-enroll on a part-time basis for at least part of a second year to complete a final project. The course consists of one two-week block and five one-week blocks of full-time study. The first three blocks are core units and must be completed by all the students. The students then select three electives from a range of options to complete the course. The blocks are taught on campus at the University of Sydney. Following each block students return to their community/workplace and complete a project that is based on the learning achieved in the block course.

The final part of the course requires students to complete a project that brings together all the different parts of the course. This is to consolidate their learning with particular emphasis on demonstrating the inclusion and importance of community participation and community development.

Student Perceptions of the Diploma Course

Graduates of the 1998 class appeared to have positive reactions to the course. One remarked: "I have learned to read about and think about Indigenous health promotion and to listen to other people’s ideas.…" Another student commented: "I have developed my skills in program development and in critically reviewing articles. I have developed my knowledge and skills in evaluation…." Most 1998 graduates felt that their knowledge of and insight into health promotion generally had been revitalized and strengthened by the course, and the mix of  "Learning on the job and studying at the same time has been useful."

People wanting to discuss the course should contact:  Shane Hearn, Co-Convenor, Graduate Diploma in Indigenous Health Promotion, Tel: 02 9351 6499, Fax:02 9351 5205, E-mail: shaneh@health.usyd.edu.au

Studying for a Masters Degree in Exercise and Nutrition Science in the Historic City of Chester, UK

by Kevin Sykes

 The Centre for Exercise and Nutrition Science (CENS) is an international specialist centre for postgraduate teaching and research based at one of UK’s leading institutes of higher education, Chester College. The College, which has over 6,500 full and part-time students is a part of the University of Liverpool. CENS is located in the School of Science and Health and is supported by the Departments of Sports Science and Biological Sciences. It has strong links with local hospitals, health authorities and corporate organisations, with UK Fire Brigades, Police Forces and the government Home Office and has an international reputation for its work in occupational and community health and fitness. CENS is a member of the International Institute for Health Promotion and attracts students from worldwide onto its very popular MSc  in Exercise & Nutrition Science.

A wide range and flexibility

There are currently 330 students from 24 nationalities on this Taught Modular Masters programme, which runs as a 1-year full-time or 2-year part-time course in the UK, and is also taught on location in Hong Kong and in Singapore. The course attracts students from a wide range of backgrounds and professions including medicine, physiotherapy, nursing, dietetics, nutrition, food science, exercise and sports science, human biology, pharmacology, ergonomics, dentists, health promotion, firefighters, police officers, lecturers, teachers, fitness leaders and sports coaches. The programme is highly flexible allowing students to mix full-time and part-time modes of study according to their needs and work commitments. Many students opt to study for a part of their programme overseas and this interchange helps foster the atmosphere of a truly international centre both in teaching and in collaborative research projects.

CENS in the UK

In the UK, the annual intake is around 40 students and modules are taught by a series of 6-week, one-morning per week classroom, laboratory and/or seminar sessions. There are also three Easter School modules delivered as short, intensive 4-day modules followed by 7 weeks of home-based learning. Each module requires the submission of  a 4,000-word written assignment or its equivalent (e.g. poster presentation). Students select 8 modules, and on successful completion, progress to the Masters Research Project which culminates in a 16,000-word Thesis.

CENS Abroad

In Hong Kong and Singapore, the part-time course is run in collaboration with the British Council and is delivered by visiting UK academics who teach the 20-hour modules over an intensive weekend and two evenings. Students then have resource packs and support from local tutors to help them to prepare their 4,000-word written assignments. Taught modules occur every 8 weeks and while most students opt to keep up this pace, many opt to study more slowly and may take a maximum of 6 years. Laboratory and library resources are available locally and the programme recruits around 20-25 students annually in each country.

There are many examples of collaborative research programmes with local and national institutions and in addition to providing research publications and conference presentations, job opportunities often arise and the proportion of students moving into related careers is very high.

CENS is now one of the largest specialist academic centres of its type in Europe with MSc, MPhil and PhD students with a mission statement of promoting health through exercise and nutrition. With over 120 graduates and a strong commitment to excellence, the course is well subscribed with many coming from worldwide to study on the recommendation of former students. Another attraction is the attractive campus of Chester College, founded by the Church in 1839, in the historic Roman city of Chester.

Dr. Kevin Sykes is Director of the Centre for Exercise & Nutrition Science at Chester College. He may be contacted at: Tel: +44-01244-392734, Email: K.Sykes@chester.ac.uk. For further details, see website:  www.chester.ac.uk/ens

Country Profile:  Education and Curriculum in Public Health and Health Promotion in Latvia

By Ineta Pirktina

The Republic of Latvia is situated on the eastern coast of the Baltic Sea. It has an area of about 25,000 square miles and a population of 2.5 million inhabitants. Latvia is firmly on track to complete a successful transition to a market economy and is working toward membership of the European Union in the course of the next decade. After high inflation and sharp declines in income and social indicators in the initial years after independence in 1990, the economy has stabilized and growth has resumed. Latvia is implementing the policies needed to meet the challenges presented by EU accession requirements and maintaining economic growth.

Health trends in Latvia

Recent data for all indicators used for evaluating human health, have shown unfavorable trends in Latvia: the birth rate is low and continues to fall; the death rate is high and continues to rise; infant mortality is high, and life expectancy at birth remains one of the shortest in Europe.

Although it is recognized that strengthening the nation’s health requires action through policy, infrastructure and competency development, and through incentives to promote health at national and local levels, there is not a single academic or professional certificate or degree program offering majors in Health Promotion in Latvia’s 26 tertiary educational institutions today. However, several high school study programs do include health promotion and health education modules, even whole courses, but the volume differs noticeably from what would be possible at the tertiary level. In short, in order to combat Latvia’s health problems effectively, educated Health Promotion professionals are essential.

Public Health Education in Latvia

In the absence of health promotion curricula and programs in Latvia, public health education somewhat fills the gap and is divided into two different parts: public health education of the general populace and professional education in public health, including postgraduate education and continuing vocational training following medical and nursing education. Additionally, there are two levels of educational programs for health care administrators: undergraduate and postgraduate.

Since 1992, special study programs in public health and in epidemiology have been developed for all Medical Academy faculties at Latvian universities. Within these study programs, 5 hours are set aside for health promotion and disease prevention issues. Students get insight on health promotion models and various prevention strategies, their advantages and drawbacks.

Studies in national health and epidemiology is also included in the programs of faculties other than the Medical Academy. For example, the Faculty of Pharmacy offers 51 lectures, the Faculty of Rehabilitation offers 25 lectures, while the Faculty of Nursing offers 36 lectures. Social work, the evaluation of national health, and the organization of prophylactic activities are taught in the Faculty of Nursing. The Faculty of Pharmacy teaches pharmo-epidemiology and the design of investigations, while the Faculty of Rehabilitation  teaches data collection and research in national health information and their uses.

A Public Health Faculty was founded in 1999 and students in these public health programs are specially prepared for prophylactic activities. The length of studies is four years in the Public Health Faculty. During this time, the students acquire theoretical knowledge in anatomy, biology, physiology, biochemistry, physics, etc. Students also study epidemiology, social medicine, health promotion, prophylaxis and organization of health services and its financing. Courses on informatics and bio-statistics train students in data analysis and interpretation. Also, basic knowledge of philosophy, ethics, sociology, pedagogy, law and physiology is required.

In their fourth year of the study in the Public Health Faculty,  students can choose one of the following foci in their studies:

  • Environmental health;
  • Health promotion and education;
  • Organization of health services.

Other opportunities to study Health Promotion in Latvia

In 1996 a Masters degree in national health studies was begun in the LAM School of Public Health. Its aim is to prepare specialists in the planning and management of health services for Latvia. The two-year program consists of four compulsory basic courses:  Introduction to National Health, Part I and Part II and Politics, Planning, and Management of Health, Part I and Part II.

Students also take two additional optional courses, one of which concentrates on health promotion.

The Centre of Professional Medical Education offers graduate training in national health nursing. The program here includes issues of national health, possible environmental risk factors, health promotion and prophylaxis.

Furthermore, health education specialists are trained at both the graduate and undergraduate levels in some Latvian universities. About 200 health educators are prepared each year in Latvia, and there is no doubt that they could give qualitative teaching about health issues to youth in the schools and often do. There is one problem however: health teaching is not a compulsory or even an optional course in many schools. So, health education specialists are too often not used effectively to promote health.

Developments and challenges

Despite a lack of focused training for health promotion professionals, there have been some important contextual developments promoting heath in Latvia, including health legislation, such as, the tobacco law, the active work of several Inter-Ministerial Commissions on tobacco control and narcotics control Commissions, and a newly formed Task Force on substance abuse prevention among youth, and a rapid growth of NGOs active in Latvian health promotion. Additionally, an Inter-Ministerial Board on Public Health issues has been set up, lead by the Ministry of Welfare, where different documents and projects concerning public health issues are discussed and approved.

Obstacles remain, however. Public health efforts lack adequate central co-ordination, there is no Board of Nutrition and thus no development of standards of nutrition; research in public health is limited; and public health, health education, and health promotion initiative are plagued by a lack of resources, particularly at the municipal level.

Therefore, though there has been some development of health promotion studies and activities in Latvia, the shift of emphasis from disease to health continues to present Latvians with many challenges. In order to implement health promotion at the national and regional levels, it will not be enough to have well-educated health promotion professionals. It is also necessary to create supportive environment and legislation in the nation. Multi-sectoral cooperation between all levels of national government, local government, community and NGO’s is a key element in the promotion of health and the forming of health promoting policy. This co-operation is an integral part of ensuring that health and the consequences of policy on health, becomes an accepted part of the national planning process.

Ineta Pirktina is Director of the Latvian Health Promotion Centre. She may be contacted at: ineta.vvc@delfi.lv

Globe.b.jpeg.JPG (6155 bytes)Global Initiatives

Australia Turns to Mental Health Promotion

Responding to a national survey showing a significant increase in mental health problems among Australia’s youth, Federal Health Minister, Michael Wooldridge, launched a strategic framework to reduce the incidence of mental health problems in Australia.

"We know that the burden of mental health problems and mental disorders is rising in our community. And, it is becoming increasingly clear that treatment interventions alone, cannot significantly reduce the enormous personal, social and financial burden associated with mental health problems and mental disorders," he said at the Mental Health Council of Australia's annual general meeting.

The National Action Plan for Promotion, Prevention and Early Intervention for Mental Health 2000, and the Promotion, Prevention and Early Intervention for Mental Health - A Monograph 2000, provides a policy and conceptual framework that was developed by Federal, State and Territory governments.

Dr. Wooldridge said he would table the findings of the national survey at the next conference of State and Territory Health Ministers.

Proactive Promotion of Smoking Cessation in the U.S.

An upscale suburb of Washington boasts the strictest anti-smoking rules in the United States after a state of Maryland county council on Tuesday voted narrowly to ban smoking outside. A spokesman said the Montgomery County Council voted 5-4 to approve the 32-acre village of Friendship Heights' ban on smoking or discarding tobacco products on any outdoor publicly maintained property.

Violators of the ban, which includes sidewalks, streets and parks, but not privately owned patios, would first be issued a warning, but fined $100 for later infractions, officials said. "It's a small step here but it's an important larger step, I think, for public health and review on a county, state or national level," said village Mayor Alfred Muller, a doctor.

Muller said Tuesday's vote meant the ban could take immediate effect but he declined to say when it would. He said he would wait for tempers to cool while planning warning signs with the community's security officers in charge of enforcement. Only one officer is on duty a day.

… and in the European Community

The European Parliament has approved controversial legislation to force the tobacco industry to print graphic health warnings on Europe's cigarette packs. The warnings would cover at least 30% of the front of each pack and 40% of the back. In addition, national governments would be given the power to order the inclusion of shocking color photographs showing the possible consequences of smoking, like rotting teeth and diseased lungs.

Euro MP Catherine Stihler, Labour's Health Spokeswoman, said: "If the size of the health warning directly reflected the risk to health, the label would cover the whole cigarette pack. Half of all long term smokers will eventually be killed by tobacco, and of these, half will die during middle age losing 20 to 25 years of life. We must go the extra mile to show people what they do to themselves when they smoke. If vivid pictures of rotting teeth and blackened lungs bring home the true cost of smoking, print them on packs in the UK in full colour." Ms Stihler said existing health warnings were obscured by clever color combinations, striking packaging and tucked behind careful displays.

The new legislation would also outlaw the use of phrases such as "light", "mild" and "low tar".

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, of the British Medical Association, welcomed the European Parliament move. She said: "Making the health warnings more visible and more informative will encourage existing smokers to give up and discourage some young people from taking up this deadly habit in the first place."

Global Innovations

The Bonusproject promotes health in the workplace and saves money in Germany

History:

  • The AOK is Germany’s largest non-profit statutory health fund ("Krankenkasse"), with a national membership of 28 million, of which 2.4 million live in the state (Bundesland) of Lower Saxony.
  • In 1996 the AOK Lower Saxony started a project giving financial incentives to companies with a strong commitment to and proven track record, in improving health in the workplace.

Partners:

  • WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen;
  • Lower Saxony Ministry for Women, Employment and Social Affairs, Hanover;
  • Institute of Technology and Employment of the University of Kaiserlautern Aims;
  • The Bonusproject promotes quality oriented health management in companies, on the basis of a systematic documentation of activities.

Participants:

  • 44 companies are participating in the project. Examples include such well-known names as Kraft Jacobs Suchard (food), Otis (escalators, elevators), Schöller (icecream), and Wilkhahn (furniture). Smaller companies come from the crafts, among them garages, hotel and catering and bakeries.

Methods:

  • The bonus is a single monthly insurance rate, which benefits the employee and the employer each;
  • Companies have to document their activities with a standardised self assessment;
  • The bonus is granted after a successful application for one year in advance;
  • At the end of the year a new application is possible;
  • In order to grant the bonus, an independent scientifically based examination is necessary;
  • Self assessment is supplemented by an external examination conducted by the Institute of Technology of the University of Kaiserslautern;
  • Guidelines for the institute are the European Foundation of Quality Management (EFQM);
  • The assessment model demands that health promotion in a company must find its reflection in the strategy and planning of a company, not in the short term but long lasting, goal oriented and systematically;
  • Resources must be provided, health must be a topic for the employees as well as for the management, an all encompassing cooperation is necessary.

Outcomes:

  • The majority of companies passed the examination for the bonus-positive changes in the majority of areas of the EFQM-model;
  • Significant improvements in well being;
  • Significant improvements of the atmosphere at work;
  • Partial reduction of sick leave and accident rates.

Contact:: AOK-Institut für Gesundheitsconsulting, Institutsleitung: Dr. Michael Drupp, Karlsruher Str. 2C, 30519 Hannover, Telefon: (0511) 87 01-440, Telefax: (0511) 87 01-700, E-Mail: michael.drupp@nds.aok.de

Upcoming Conferences

1st Annual International Conference on Health and Productivity. Hosted by the Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO). Washington D.C. February 12-14, 2001.

XVII World Conference on Health Promotion and Health Education: "Health: an  investment for a just society". The 50th anniversary conference of the International Union of Health Promotion and Education. Paris, France. July 15-20, 2001.

6th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science. Hosted by the German Sport University, Cologne, Germany. July 24-28, 2001.

6th Annual IIHP Meeting hosted by Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic.  September 18-21.

HP LOGO.jpeg.JPG (26244 bytes)International Institute for Health Promotion Newsflashes

by Wolf Kirsten

"Five Year Review of the IIHP – What Next?" Summary of Strategic Planning Sessions at the IIHP Meeting in Washington, DC, October, 2000

During last year's IIHP Meeting in Washington, DC, the participants took a look back at the last five years of the IIHP and a look ahead to the next five years. The overriding goal of the discussion was about strategies for the IIHP global network to build on its solid foundation.

The IIHP was originally designed to be a forum for discussion and the sharing of ideas in the field of health promotion and has purposely not taken the form of a traditional organization with a heavy bureaucracy. The accomplishments of the last five years can be listed as the following:

  • The IIHP has grown from 30-40 affiliates in 1996 to an international network of over 200;
  • Five annual meetings: three in Washington, DC, one in Mauritius and one in Curitiba;
  • International health promotion newsletter;
  • Training seminars with in-country partners;
  • Participation in numerous international conferences including the global conferences of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Jakarta and Mexico City;
  • Launching of working committees with special interest areas: training and curriculum, workplace health promotion, global fitness testing and advocacy and communication;
  • Internship position in Washington, DC;
  • Ongoing support and sharing of information among IIHP members.

The meeting participants agreed upon the following characteristics as strengths of the IIHP:

  • Informal and inclusive nature;
  • Minimal bureaucracy;
  • Flexibility;
  • Multi-disciplinary forum of distinguished professionals;
  • Supportive university (American University) as a stable base.

The planning sessions on the future of the IIHP looked at macro and micro level issues and made specific recommendations. On a macro level, health promotion is a relatively new concept and the IIHP is experiencing some of the challenges typical for most international organizations. Nevertheless, the IIHP needs more active members who participate on a regular basis. More involvement could entail a regional representation of the IIHP.

On a micro level, collaboration through an international project, the development of a short course program and an international survey were proposed. These suggestions led to the following more specific recommendations:

  • Select one specific project (e.g., workplace as setting) and link with key organizations (e.g., WHO, PAHO, private corporation);
  • Increase focus on training seminars;
  • Facilitate academic exchange programs;
  • Create funded international internship position at IIHP;
  • Develop website into first class information resource;
  • Approach funding sources more aggressively (national/international);
  • Raise visibility through publications;
  • Increase cooperation with corporate sector;
  • Continue to host annual meetings in different regions of the world.

During the closing session of the meeting, the participants emphasized their desire to be "avant-garde" leaders for health promotion through the IIHP. The IIHP should "shape the future" by giving cutting edge input to governments, corporations and other large organizations on policies, strategic plans and programmatic initiatives. Therefore, the IIHP should remain cooperative and flexible, expand globally and take advantage of strategic opportunities.

The 2001 annual meeting will take place in Olomouc in the Czech Republic (September 18-21, 2001). The IIHP is fortunate to have a distinguished university with a long tradition, Palacky University, hosting the meeting. Olomouc is a beautiful city three hours east from Prague. An international conference and multiple health promotion workshops will be held in conjunction, creating a similar (successful) scenario like in Curitiba, Brazil in 1999, where a national conference was held in conjunction with the IIHP meeting. Palacky University has been an active member since the inception of the IIHP and have shown their excellent hospitality at their first international conference in 1999. A greater representation of European institutions, Western and Eastern, is anticipated, compared to previous IIHP meetings.

The International Institute for Health Promotion (IIHP) is a global center for the development and advancement of health promotion policies, programs, services, and research that maximizes multiple efforts across the globe.  It was established in 1994 as an addition to the National Center for Health Fitness at American University in Washington, DC, to assist in leading, facilitating, and coordinating the efforts of many international individuals and organizations.  More than 50 cooperating members from 25 nations form an extensive interdisciplinary health promotion network that includes ongoing dialogue, information exchange and project participation.  Email the IIHP at iihpaa@american.edu.  The IIHP website is http://www.healthy.american.edu/iihp.html

Permission to Reprint

Individuals and organizations are encouraged and authorized to print one copy, in full, of this issue of the online version of Health Promotion:  Global Perspectives.   Furthermore, readers are authorized and encouraged to print multiple copies of the issue, in full, and distribute it to colleagues, after permission to reproduce has been secured from American Journal of Health Promotion, Inc.  In your request, please specify the number of copies you wish to make and the types of people you will send them to.  Under no condition can portions of the issue be reproduced and under no conditions can copies be sold.

American Journal of Health Promotion 248-682-0707

  Privacy Policy