|
|
A Billion Deaths from Tobacco and
Cuts in Tobacco Prevention Funding
Volume 22, Issue 5
The World Health Organization released a report
that concludes one billion people will die globally from tobacco use in
this century,1 more than those who will die from any other
single cause. Have we seen mobilization of funds to address this
scourge? Not in the United States. In fact, funding for community
tobacco programs continues to be cut, and the decline in smoking rates
in the U.S. has stalled at 20.8% since 2004 after seven straight years
of decline.2
The most recent casualty is in my home state of
Ohio. One of the first actions Governor Strickland made after taking
office in January 2007 was to securitize future payments from the 1998
Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with the tobacco industry. This means
he signed over the $12 to $20 billion that would be paid to the state
from the MSA between 2007 and 2047 in exchange for $5.05 billion in
2007. He promptly spent that money on property tax cuts for a small
segment of the population and construction funds for new schools (much
of which would have been paid for by property taxes if he had not cut
them). The future payments from MSA are gone, and Ohio is now expecting
a state budget deficit in 2008.
The irony in the whole situation is that Ohio has
seen a very impressive return on the money spent on its tobacco
prevention efforts. The Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation (OTPF)3
was created in 2000 with the expectation of receiving approximately $900
million from the MSA over the next seven years, and then additional
funds from them in 2008 through 2025. This would allow it to spend about
$40 million/year on tobacco prevention and control efforts in Ohio, less
than one third of the $145 million annual budget recommended for Ohio by
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. OTPF has used these funds to
launch a state telephone Quitline, expand face-to-face programs to serve
low income residents in community clinics, stimulate hospitals to
integrate tobacco treatment into medical care, sponsor peer-led programs
in schools, and identify effective policy solutions. Smoking rates
dropped from 27.6% in 2001 to 22.4% in 2006, outpacing the national
decline.4 My own calculations showed this drop in smoking
rates will save 3,219,584 years of life and prevent $4.8 billion in
medical costs between 2000 and 2018, even if smoking rates never drop
below 22.4%. The savings to the Ohio state Medicaid fund are estimated
at $720 million. If anyone can find a better return on any investment
the state of Ohio has made in the last decade, I will eat a pack of
cigarettes (yuck!).
OTPF received payments totaling $340 billion in 2000 and 2001, but the
Ohio legislature diverted $568 million in MSA funds from the OTPF to the
general state budget in 2002-2006, with the promise of repayment in
2013, 2014, and 2015. Governor Strickland’s recent securitization
actions eliminated the likelihood of any repayment. The OTPF is now
stuck with the very likely prospect of going out of existence by 2016.
Will smoking rates increase? Will medical care costs increase in excess
of the money that would have been spent on tobacco prevention? Will more
people die who could have been saved? Why would we think anything else
would occur? Similar funding cuts have occurred in other states. In
2008, only three states are funding tobacco prevention programs at the
minimum level recommended by CDC, 17 others are funding at more than
half the minimum level, and the rest are funding at less than half the
minimum recommended levels. Nationwide, less than 3% of MSA funds will
be spent on tobacco prevention in 2008.5
Whose fault is this? It is easy to blame the
politicians, and we should. They are the ones making the poor decisions.
Part of the problem is the short sightedness caused by elected politics.
Elected officials want to make a big splash during their current term so
they can get re-elected, or move on to something bigger. But the blame
really comes down to YOU and ME. We let our leaders make poor decisions
by not crafting our messages well and by spending too little time and
money influencing policy. Advocates in some states are making great
progress. Citizens of Florida were successful in passing a
constitutional amendment that requires 15% of MSA funding to be spent on
tobacco prevention. This has increased annual funding from $1 million to
$58 million.
What can you do? Get more involved in advocacy! On
the tobacco issue, my recommendation is that you go to the website of
the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (http://www.tobaccofreekids.org)
and sign up to be a grassroots advocate. They will let you know every
time there is an important tobacco issue in the nation and even in your
state. They will make it very easy for you to take action by telling you
exactly what to do. For more broad health promotion issues, I encourage
you to go to the website of Health Promotion Advocates (http://www.HealthPromotionAdvocates.org)
and sign up to be a grassroots advocate. The current issues are passing
legislation to provide a planning and research base for health promotion
(Health Promotion FIRST) and providing tax credits for comprehensive
workplace health promotion programs (Healthy Workforce Act). Working
together we can make a huge impact!
Michael P. O'Donnell, PhD, MBA, MPH
- World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/en/index.html,
Accessed February 24, 2008.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5644.pdf
Accessed February 24, 2008.
- Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation, http://www.otpf.org/.
Accessed February 24, 2008.
- Ohio Tobacco Research & Evaluation Center. http://www.otrec.org.
Accessed February 24, 2008.
- Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Special Reports State Tobacco
Settlement. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/settlements.
Accessed February 24, 2008
|